Screener
CWI vs SPGM
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Key differences
- SPGM costs 0.21% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SPGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWI | SPGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $1.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.73% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.25% | 12.96% |
| Max drawdown | -34.64% | -33.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWI and SPGM
Explore further