Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

DFAS vs BUSA

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF vs Brandes U.S. Value ETF

DFAS

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$14.0B

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

Brandes

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$292M

Key differences

  • DFAS costs 0.34% less per year.
  • DFAS is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DFASBUSA
Annual cost (TER)0.26%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$14.0B$292M
Since19982023
Dividend yield0.94%1.48%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+28.6%+23.9%
CAGR 3Y+15.9%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.67N/A
Volatility 1Y16.89%11.96%
Max drawdown-26.13%-14.19%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to DFAS and BUSA