Screener
DMAX vs BUFQ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Dec ETF vs FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
Key differences
- DMAX costs 0.50% less per year.
- BUFQ is significantly larger than DMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DMAX | BUFQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.8% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.36% | 8.50% |
| Max drawdown | -3.37% | -15.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DMAX and BUFQ
Explore further