Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EAOA vs AOR

iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

EAOA

iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$36M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.5B

Key differences

  • AOR is significantly larger than EAOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EAOA follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, EAOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EAOAAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.18%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$36M$3.5B
Since20202008
Dividend yield2.03%2.53%
Asset classmixed assetmixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+24.4%+19.8%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+14.4%
CAGR 5Y+8.7%+7.1%
Sharpe 3Y1.101.11
Volatility 1Y10.80%8.47%
Max drawdown-25.06%-22.95%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EAOA and AOR