Screener
EAOM vs SUSC
iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUSC is significantly larger than EAOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EAOM is classified as mixed asset, while SUSC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EAOM follows a active selection strategy; SUSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EAOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EAOM | SUSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.84% | 4.45% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.47% | 4.47% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -22.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EAOM and SUSC
Explore further