Screener
EEM vs IEFA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.65% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM covers emerging markets markets; IEFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $180.7B |
| Since | 2003 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.54% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and IEFA
Explore further