Screener
EMBD vs BREM
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.11% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; BREM uses index tracking.
- EMBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | BREM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $38M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -4.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and BREM
Explore further