Screener
EMBD vs EMBX
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.37% less per year.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $244M |
| Since | 2020 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 5.94% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and EMBX
Explore further