Screener
EMBD vs EMM
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.27% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD is classified as fixed income, while EMM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $58M |
| Since | 2020 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +54.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 21.25% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and EMM
Explore further