Screener
EMBD vs PFFD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFD costs 0.16% less per year.
- PFFD is significantly larger than EMBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD covers emerging markets markets; PFFD covers north america.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; PFFD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | PFFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 6.30% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 7.21% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -30.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and PFFD
Explore further