Screener
EMEQ vs PWER
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Nomura Energy Transition ETF
Key differences
Both EMEQ and PWER are equity ETFs. EMEQ charges 0.86% a year and PWER 0.80%. The main difference: EMEQ follows a active selection strategy; PWER uses index tracking.
- EMEQ follows a active selection strategy; PWER uses index tracking.
- EMEQ covers emerging markets; PWER covers North America.
- PWER costs 0.06% less per year.
- EMEQ is much larger than PWER. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMEQ | PWER | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.86% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $623M | $13M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | 1.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +129.6% | +60.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.36% | 20.72% |
| Max drawdown | -19.24% | -29.67% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.