Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMMF vs GEM

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

EMMF

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund

Annual cost

0.48%

Fund size

$187M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both EMMF and GEM are equity ETFs. EMMF charges 0.48% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: EMMF follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • EMMF follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • GEM costs 0.13% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than EMMF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

EMMFGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.48%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$187M$1.7B
Since20182015
Dividend yield1.88%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+39.2%+43.1%
CAGR 3Y+22.1%+22.0%
CAGR 5Y+9.4%+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.201.00
Volatility 1Y17.72%20.68%
Max drawdown-32.57%-37.02%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EMMF and GEM