Screener
EMSF vs FNDE
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDE costs 0.40% less per year.
- FNDE is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; FNDE uses index tracking.
- FNDE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $9.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 3.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 14.79% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -39.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and FNDE
Explore further