Screener
EMSF vs SPEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.72% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; SPEM uses index tracking.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 15.88% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -36.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and SPEM
Explore further