Screener
EPRF vs ISBG
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF
Key differences
EPRF is a fixed income ETF, while ISBG is an alternative ETF. EPRF charges 0.47% a year and ISBG 1.14%.
- EPRF is a fixed income fund, while ISBG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; ISBG uses active selection.
- EPRF costs 0.67% less per year.
- EPRF is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | ISBG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 1.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $5M |
| Since | 2016 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 6.11% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.54% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -49.42% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.