Screener
EPS vs NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- EPS costs 0.12% less per year.
- EPS follows a index tracking strategy; NTSX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EPS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPS | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.49% | 12.52% |
| Max drawdown | -35.79% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPS and NTSX
Explore further