Screener
EWT vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EWT and AAXJ are equity ETFs. EWT charges 0.59% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: EWT costs 0.13% less per year.
- EWT costs 0.13% less per year.
- Over the last three years, EWT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWT | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.8B | $4.0B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +90.1% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.2% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.3% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.22% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -38.88% | -44.52% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.