Screener
EWT vs EEMA
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both EWT and EEMA are equity ETFs. EWT charges 0.59% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: EWT covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- EWT covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- EEMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- EWT is much larger than EEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWT | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.8B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.5% | +45.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.3% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.30% | 21.41% |
| Max drawdown | -38.88% | -44.18% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.