Screener
EWT vs SCJ
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both EWT and SCJ are equity ETFs. EWT charges 0.59% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: SCJ costs 0.09% less per year.
- SCJ costs 0.09% less per year.
- EWT is much larger than SCJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWT | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.8B | $245M |
| Since | 2000 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.5% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.3% | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.30% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -38.88% | -37.28% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.