Screener
EZMO vs QMOM
Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
- QMOM costs 0.55% less per year.
- QMOM is significantly larger than EZMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZMO follows a index tracking strategy; QMOM uses active selection.
- QMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZMO | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.83% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $519M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.09% |
| Max drawdown | -9.23% | -39.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZMO and QMOM
Explore further