Screener
FFDI vs BFLX
Fidelity Fundamental Developed vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.15% less per year.
- FFDI follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFDI | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | — |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.11% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.99% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.39% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFDI and BFLX
Explore further