Screener
FFLS vs AMUN
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while AMUN is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and AMUN 0.25%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while AMUN is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; AMUN uses active selection.
- AMUN costs 1.35% less per year.
- AMUN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | AMUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $54M |
| Since | 2023 | 1986 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.26% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -0.61% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.