Screener
FFLS vs CATF
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CATF is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CATF 0.27%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CATF is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CATF uses active selection.
- CATF costs 1.33% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CATF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $78M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 3.13% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -4.83% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.