Screener
FFLS vs CCOR
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- CCOR costs 0.31% less per year.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $28M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and CCOR
Explore further