Screener
FFLS vs CGMS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CGMS is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CGMS 0.39%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CGMS is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
- CGMS costs 1.21% less per year.
- CGMS is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 6.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 3.44% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -4.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.