Screener
FFLS vs CLIX
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while CLIX is an equity ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and CLIX 0.65%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while CLIX is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; CLIX uses inverse.
- CLIX costs 0.95% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLIX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | CLIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $7M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 21.01% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -73.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.