Screener
FFLS vs FBND
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while FBND is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and FBND 0.36%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while FBND is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; FBND uses index tracking.
- FFLS covers North America; FBND covers global markets.
- FBND costs 1.24% less per year.
- FBND is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $26.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 3.83% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -17.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.