Screener
FFLS vs FDRS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 1.11% less per year.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $77M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and FDRS
Explore further