Screener
FFLS vs FFOX
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FFOX costs 0.58% less per year.
- FFOX is significantly larger than FFLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFLS is classified as alternative, while FFOX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; FFOX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | FFOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 1.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $217M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -12.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLS and FFOX
Explore further