Screener
FFLS vs MUSI
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while MUSI is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and MUSI 0.38%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while MUSI is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
- MUSI costs 1.22% less per year.
- MUSI is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $221M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 5.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 3.34% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -13.91% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.