Screener
FFLS vs SDFI
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs AB Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while SDFI is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and SDFI 0.30%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while SDFI is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; SDFI uses active selection.
- SDFI costs 1.30% less per year.
- SDFI is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SDFI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | SDFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $174M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 4.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 2.09% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -1.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.