Screener
FFND vs RGLO
One Global ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.51% less per year.
- RGLO is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $309M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and RGLO
Explore further