Screener
FICS vs FFEM
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- FFEM costs 0.10% less per year.
- FICS is significantly larger than FFEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $39M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.22% | 21.16% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FICS and FFEM
Explore further