Screener
FICS vs XAUG
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- FICS costs 0.15% less per year.
- FICS is significantly larger than XAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FICS is classified as equity, while XAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FICS follows a index tracking strategy; XAUG uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | XAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $51M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.22% | 4.51% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -8.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FICS and XAUG
Explore further