Screener
FLAX vs EWJ
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAX costs 0.30% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAX | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $21.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 4.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.5% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.62% | 19.77% |
| Max drawdown | -42.51% | -33.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLAX and EWJ
Explore further