Screener
FLSW vs FLCH
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF vs Franklin FTSE China ETF
Key differences
- FLSW costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLCH is significantly larger than FLSW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLSW covers europe markets; FLCH covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, FLSW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLSW | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $81M | $282M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.07% | 2.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | -4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.44% | 19.12% |
| Max drawdown | -28.16% | -62.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLSW and FLCH
Explore further