Screener
FLXR vs AMAX
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
FLXR is a fixed income ETF, while AMAX is an alternative ETF. FLXR charges 0.40% a year and AMAX 1.36%.
- FLXR is a fixed income fund, while AMAX is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FLXR follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- FLXR costs 0.96% less per year.
- FLXR is much larger than AMAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.2B | $64M |
| Since | 2018 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.71% | 10.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +10.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | 10.24% |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -16.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.