Screener
FLXR vs RHRX
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
FLXR is a fixed income ETF, while RHRX is an alternative ETF. FLXR charges 0.40% a year and RHRX 1.38%.
- FLXR is a fixed income fund, while RHRX is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FLXR follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- FLXR covers global markets; RHRX covers North America.
- FLXR costs 0.98% less per year.
- FLXR is much larger than RHRX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.2B | $36M |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.71% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +38.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | 13.58% |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -25.33% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.