Screener
FLXR vs TUGN
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
FLXR is a fixed income ETF, while TUGN is an alternative ETF. FLXR charges 0.40% a year and TUGN 0.65%.
- FLXR is a fixed income fund, while TUGN is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FLXR follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- FLXR covers global markets; TUGN covers North America.
- FLXR costs 0.25% less per year.
- FLXR is much larger than TUGN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.2B | $78M |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.71% | 10.59% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | 15.91% |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -23.45% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.