Screener
FORH vs CCNR
Formidable ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
FORH is an alternative ETF, while CCNR is an equity ETF. FORH charges 1.19% a year and CCNR 0.39%.
- FORH is an alternative fund, while CCNR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
- CCNR costs 0.80% less per year.
- CCNR is much larger than FORH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $393M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +61.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.98% | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -20.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.