Screener
FORH vs MAVF
Formidable ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- MAVF costs 0.44% less per year.
- MAVF is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while MAVF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; MAVF uses active selection.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $91M |
| Since | 2021 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 14.06% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -14.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and MAVF
Explore further