Screener
FORH vs RFFC
Formidable ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
FORH is an alternative ETF, while RFFC is an equity ETF. FORH charges 1.19% a year and RFFC 0.48%.
- FORH is an alternative fund, while RFFC is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- RFFC costs 0.71% less per year.
- Over the last three years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $30M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.1% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.98% | 12.25% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -36.26% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.