Screener
GAL vs DYTA
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.97% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than DYTA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while DYTA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; DYTA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | DYTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $96M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -9.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and DYTA
Explore further