Screener
GLOF vs FVAL
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.05% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $196M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.58% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GLOF and FVAL
Explore further