Screener
GLOF vs JHMD
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF vs John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
Key differences
Both GLOF and JHMD are equity ETFs. GLOF charges 0.20% a year and JHMD 0.39%. The main difference: GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; JHMD uses index enhanced.
- GLOF follows a index tracking strategy; JHMD uses index enhanced.
- GLOF covers global markets; JHMD covers global markets excluding the US.
- GLOF costs 0.19% less per year.
- JHMD is much larger than GLOF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GLOF | JHMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $950M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 2.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.92% | 14.84% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -35.67% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.