Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs FDHY

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

FDHY

Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$522M

Key differences

Both GPRF and FDHY are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and FDHY 0.35%. The main difference: GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; FDHY uses active selection.

  • GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; FDHY uses active selection.
  • FDHY costs 0.10% less per year.
  • FDHY is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • FDHY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFFDHY
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$522M
Since20242018
Dividend yield5.61%6.53%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+7.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+8.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.99
Volatility 1Y3.76%3.58%
Max drawdown-4.36%-20.01%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and FDHY