Screener
GPRF vs FLCO
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Franklin Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
Both GPRF and FLCO are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and FLCO 0.35%. The main difference: GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; FLCO uses active selection.
- GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; FLCO uses active selection.
- GPRF covers North America; FLCO covers global markets.
- FLCO costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLCO is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLCO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPRF | FLCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $581M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | 4.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.76% | 4.41% |
| Max drawdown | -4.36% | -22.71% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.