Screener
GPRF vs FTMA
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Inc ETF
Key differences
Both GPRF and FTMA are fixed income ETFs. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and FTMA 0.35%. The main difference: FTMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- FTMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- FTMA is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPRF | FTMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $290M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.61% | 3.15% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.76% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.36% | -2.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.