Skip to content
Screener

GPRF vs INCM

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Franklin Income Focus ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$88M

INCM

Franklin Income Focus ETF

Annual cost

0.38%

Fund size

$1.5B

Key differences

GPRF is a fixed income ETF, while INCM is an alternative ETF. GPRF charges 0.45% a year and INCM 0.38%.

  • GPRF is a fixed income fund, while INCM is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GPRF follows a index tracking strategy; INCM uses multi strategy.
  • GPRF covers North America; INCM covers emerging markets.
  • INCM costs 0.07% less per year.
  • INCM is much larger than GPRF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

GPRFINCM
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.38%
Fund size (AUM)$88M$1.5B
Since20242023
Dividend yield5.61%5.06%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+5.8%+15.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y3.76%5.39%
Max drawdown-4.36%-7.84%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GPRF and INCM