Screener
GRW vs ABLS
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF
Key differences
Both GRW and ABLS are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and ABLS 0.39%. The main difference: GRW follows a active selection strategy; ABLS uses index tracking.
- GRW follows a active selection strategy; ABLS uses index tracking.
- ABLS costs 0.36% less per year.
- GRW is much larger than ABLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $1M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 11.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.5% | +0.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.67% | 17.58% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -19.29% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.